Let Freedom Ring

 

When strangers live with you in your land, you must not oppress them.  The strangers who live with you shall be to you like citizens; you shall love them as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. — Leviticus 19:33

 

and whoever saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all humankind.

Qur’an 5:32

 

 

Often, it takes but a single story – one stroke on the human canvass – to paint a near-complete picture.  In his stirring and provocative book Tainted Legacy: 9/11 and the Ruin of Human Rights, Unitarian Universalist minister, former President of the UU Association and now Executive Director of Amnesty International/USA, William Schulz introduces us to one such story.  It’s the story of Shahram Hashemi.

            He wore a firefighter’s coat, and a respirator hung around his neck.  But, unlike other firefighters rushing toward the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, Shahram had no helmet or boots.  That is because he was in fact not a professional firefighter but a college student from Iran, on his way to his job as an intern at the Bank of New York on Wall Street when the first tower collapsed.  Seeing several women, dazed and covered in ash, he guided them into the lobby of the bank.

            Thousands of people were running away from the blast, but some people, firefighters and police, were heading toward it.  “They knew it might be the end of their lives,” he said later, “but they went.”  That inspired Hashemi to join them, to try to help.  Racing into the direction of the towers, he was soon in danger from the raging flames.  Near Battery Park, a firefighter spotted him and handed him a protective fireman’s jacket.  “Is there anything I can do?” Hashemi cried out. “Yes,” the fireman shouted back.  “We lost a lot of people back there.”  “It was a moment I will never forget,” Hashemi recalled.  “It was dark and the fire was everywhere.  You couldn’t breathe.  We knew that at any moment we could die.  So I told the fireman, “My name is Shahram Hashemi and just in case anything happens to me, let my family know.”  The fireman said he would, embraced the young Muslim, and then made the sign of the cross.  “Christ protect you,” he said.

            Then Hashemi went to work, joining other civilians in teams.  Later he would carry water in buckets.  Several times he came close to being killed, and finally, when the forty-seven-story building collapsed, he became trapped inside, and disoriented.  Eventually he was spotted and evacuated by ferry to a hospital.  The doctors in the triage unit were all Jewish, Hashemi noted, perhaps from Beth Israel Hospital.  And when the ordeal was finally over, he took time to reflect: ‘The way I see it,’ he said, ‘I was blessed by three religious that day.  It was my Islamic faith that motivated me to go back and help.  I was blessed in the name of Jesus at the most dangerous moment of my life, and then I was helped by Jewish doctors.’ (65-66)

            Shahram Hashemi’s heroism could not have prepared him for what was to follow; his story was just beginning.  Frankly, I don’t think anyone was ready for what was to come next – the trauma and shock that have permeated our lives since 9/11/01 will continue for years to come I’m afraid.  For those who lost family and friends, for those whose lives are intertwined with the events and challenges that came later and continue to come – these are all very real and shaping.  Many of these are daily headline news and try as we might – while we may yearn and groan to escape the reminders of conflict – we cannot dismiss or forget what is going on.  We live with the reminders and we live with the fear, uncertainty, and the insecurity.

            This is all true, it is real.  And in the name of freedom and patriotism, security and protectionism we have given our leaders permission (and in some cases without our permission) to strip us of the very things that we thought made us different from our attackers, the terrorists.  Every time the overhead highway signs read “Report suspicious terrorist activity,” every time I hear of yet another new spin about why we are in Iraq and the “The War on Terrorism” is stuck and needs more money; when I heard about the recent disruption of an Islamic graduate program in Virginia and the confiscation of their records, when I heard about a colleague who left this area because he couldn’t live with the pressure of being at “ground zero;” when I see the closed gates and barracked entrances at the Naval Academy, and when our leadership has named legislation that dismantles and removes civil liberties and human rights in the name of freedom and accuses those who question its appropriateness as disloyal and unpatriotic – now, two and a half years after New York Iranian student intern Shahram Hashemi risked his life to serve those in need of help, two years later, Do you feel safer, protected, secure?  Do you feel the nation has come together to face a common enemy?  And what, who and where is this enemy?

            And what has prompted me to say all of this?  One of three things.  First, it’s the second anniversary of the USA Patriot Act, legislation that allowed the indefinite detention of immigrants and other non-citizens.  When the government imprisoned more than 1200 men of Middle Eastern and South Asian descent and refused to disclose their identity, location or reason for detention, or when they wanted to question 8000 men who were in the US legally, they didn’t need to give reason – like they were terrorist suspects.  As implied by this legislation, patriotism now means allowing for the violation of US rights and basic human rights, in addition to the government being given the freedom to spy on religious and political organizations, monitor your reading and movie watching preferences, investigate citizens without probable cause, it broadens secret searches and surveillance, and a lot, lot more.  And if this wasn’t enough, proposed legislation being dubbed Patriot Act II would give the government additional "broad, sweeping new powers to increase domestic intelligence-gathering, surveillance and law enforcement prerogatives, and simultaneously decrease judicial review and public access to information," (says the Center for Public Integrity).

            I know there are many of you who know much more about these laws than I do.  So, let me just say that I agree with Rabbi Fred Reiner of D.C.’s Temple Sinai who told his congregation on the eve of Yom Kippur this year: “What I know is that these are laws not of patriotism, but nativism.  They are laws not of protection, but of suspicion.  They are laws that tear at our nation’s commitment to welcome the stranger and replace that welcome with mistrust.  These laws have compromised the civil liberties of thousands … they have created new fears and suspicions.” (sermon, 10.5.03)

            Which is what Shahram Heshemi soon learned.  Bill Schulz tells us:

            A little more than a year after he became a hero on September 11, Shahram was required by the INS to report to its office to be photographed and fingerprinted.  It is not that he had done anything wrong.  But he is Iranian, one of thousands of men from those twenty selected countries, nineteen of them predominantly Muslim whom the United States now wants to register and fingerprint en masse.

            Shahram who had been in the United States for four years already, was chagrined.  Humiliated.  He couldn’t sleep.  “I am not afraid of fingerprint [sic],” he said.  “But the foreign students being educated here, like me, are the best potential allies for the United States when we go back to our native countries.  We have seen this great democratic system.  But this act [the registration] just typecasts these students in a way that’s degrading. (105)

            Schulz concludes: “In its ‘anything goes’ mentality in the fight against terrorism; its inclination to downplay, if not ignore, even the most egregious human rights violations of its allies; its tendency to see terrorists under every turban; its conviction that international covenants mean little and matter less, [our leadership] has done more to damage human rights in two and half years than the occasional hypocrisy and frequent indifference of [past leadership].  And it has done so largely with the acquiescence of the American people.  Part of that passivity is attributable to fear, to the assumption that the violation of other people’s rights is necessary in order to keep [us] safe.” (105-106)

            Schulz’s comments are especially appropriate for us as Unitarian Universalists.  In another time – 450 years ago – and in another place – Geneva – the names were different, but the circumstances are close enough to be parallel in a very dramatic if not disturbing manner.  This is a second reason for my sermon this morning.  Tomorrow is the 450th anniversary of the martyring of religious progressive and Unitarian theologian Michael Servetus who died at the hands of protestant reformer and religious autocrat John Calvin.  Calvin, acting in a style becoming the USA Patriot Act I and proposed Act II, and with the support of the Spanish Inquisition, the French Inquisition, the courts, family and friends (who were terrified that if they didn’t help they would be imprisoned and/or die), hunted down Servetus using informants, the best surveillance offered in the 14th century, bribes, laws, threats – everything he could use – to stop this man who was accused of being a major threat to the peace, harmony, safety and security of Europe (the world).  His crime?  Freedom of religious expression. Specifically, he had questioned the doctrine of the trinity and the ritual of infant baptism.  But what really hurt him was he denounced the Catholic Church hierarchy and the leadership of John Calvin.  And so, when they finally caught up with him, walked him through the appearance of a fair trial, he was found guilty and burned at the stake, along with his books or at least those that they could find because the book had been banned, in the center of Geneva on October 27, 1553.

            Servetus’ story is a remarkable one, and if you have not yet read Out of the Flames, I urge you to – it is a fantastic story that clearly draws a line that leads from Servetus to our version of Unitarian Universalism (and the book is unlike anything else I’ve every read).  This story, and those of others, demonstrates without question why we Unitarian Universalists have been such passionate and adamant defenders of civil and human rights.  It’s because the denial of these rights have been used against us for centuries.  Not only are we a small faith community, we have usually been on the progressive, heretical edge of theological reflection and civic action.  From the Council of Nicea in 325 (when unitarianism was denied and the trinity was created) to the ordination of gays and lesbians, Unitarian Universalists have promoted and affirmed the “inherent worth and dignity of every person ... with justice, equity and compassion for all.”  This principle has been at the heart of our way of religion, it is our heritage, it is our legacy; letting freedom ring is at the core of what it means to be a Unitarian Universalist.

            We know what it means to be on the outside looking in.  And while that doesn’t mean we want to be on the inside, we know what it means to be the stranger, the one who is different, the one who thinks and believes (and acts on those beliefs) in a way that sets us apart.  And like the Jews of post-exilic Israel, we too should have a special appreciation for the ancient words (what one professor of mine called the oldest words of Hebrew scripture) which are found in Leviticus 19: “When strangers live with you in your land, you must not oppress them.  The strangers who live with you shall be to you like citizens; you shall love them as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.”

            Given our history as religious progressives – as heretics, given the legislation that our political leadership and Americans appear to have accepted without much question, given our history of being the stranger, we Unitarian Universalists have a unique perspective.  And it is we, with other religious progressives, who must be asking: “How much security is enough?  What is its human cost?  When does our quest for national security destroy the values that have built our nation?” (Reiner)  We know that you cannot legislate security.  We know that the human cost will be tremendous.  We know that as our national insecurity grows, the values that built our nation will erode.

            Finally, tomorrow is the first day of the month-long Islamic observance of Ramadan, a third reason for this sermon.  With the traditional fasting, Ramadan presents every Muslim with the opportunity to commit to acts of faith in ways of intensity that might be missed during the regular year.  Like in Judaism’s High Holy Days and the Christian’s period of Lent, Ramadan is a time when you renew your commitment to the teachings and ways of the Prophet, which include, of course, being in right relationship with your neighbors – with strangers.  It has been related that the Holy Prophet Mohammad said: “Anybody amongst you who notices something evil, should correct it with his own hands, and if he is unable to do so, he should prohibit the same with his tongue; if he is unable even to do this, he should at least consider it as bad in his heart; this is the lowest degree of faith.”  From this comes a verse in the Qur’an: “… and whoever saveth the life of one, it shall be as if they had saved the life of all humankind.” (5:32)

            There is a thread that weaves through my three themes this morning – anniversaries of the Patriot Act and of Servetus’ martyrdom, and the beginning of Ramadan – a thread which speaks passionately and boldly about safety and fear, freedom and insecurity, doing what is right and denying rights.  All of these in the larger context of relationships between communities of people, religions, and nations.

            Our future as a people of faith, our future as a nation, our future and the lessons and promise that we share with Shahram Hashemi and all the many others who have come to this country and now call it home, is a future which, in spite of the many valleys and ruts that have shaped our history, recognizes the wisdom and dream of religious and civic prophets of every age. It is toward that promise that we know we must work, in whatever ways we can.  We must contribute to shaping a nation not of fear but of hope and freedom, a nation that welcomes the stranger; we must contribute to shaping a faith that reminds us and challenges the world to think and act outside of narrow visions and fear-based solutions.  We know it can be different; we know it doesn’t have to be like this; we know we can change.  We know, as Rumi knew, there is another vision: “Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing there is a field.  I will meet you there.”  (adapted from Rumi/Riley)

 

 

 

 

This sermon was given on October 26, 2003 at

the Unitarian Universalist Church of Annapolis by

the Rev. Fredric J. Muir.